Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

3

4

5

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.4

3.7

3.3

2.8

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

99

36

40

139

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

74%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk Sport

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison