18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
10
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.0
7.6
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
109
87
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store