18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
14
14
4
3
5
Best position
#2
#2
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
5.5
13.4
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
700
153
40
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store