18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
13
6
5
3
4
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
4.3
4.7
2.2
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
123
146
63
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store