18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
4
23
3
24
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
111
176
36
302
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison