18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
4
18
6
4
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
111
47
146
40
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison