18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
18
6
5
4
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
12.0
6.1
4.7
2.2
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
111
47
146
63
40
36

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison