18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
10
4
6
16
3
1
Best position
#2
#3
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
4.7
5.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
111
146
153
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store