18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
10
4
3
5
18
4
1
Best position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
3.7
2.2
6.1
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
111
36
63
47
40
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison