Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2 SUV

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

10

2

1

4

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

1.5

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

109

54

66

40

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

80%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2 SUV

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison