18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

HS52 stops shorter on dry; PS71 dominates standing water and covers far more sizes.

Kumho's Ecsta summer range covers a surprisingly broad spread of driver needs, and the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 illustrate that clearly. Both sit in the brand's upper-middle passenger tyre tier, but they serve noticeably different briefs. The HS52 is Kumho's balanced everyday performer — designed to deliver confident safety across dry and wet conditions at a price that consistently surprises testers. The PS71 is the wet-weather and aquaplaning specialist, a more performance-oriented tyre built for a wider range of fitments including larger, more demanding vehicles. If you're choosing between them, you're really deciding whether your priority is all-round value and braking confidence, or maximum resistance to standing water and a broader size choice.

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Good for
Everyday drivers wanting strong dry braking confidence Budget-conscious buyers seeking competitive wet safety Owners of smaller cars on 14–17 inch wheels Drivers prioritising balanced all-round performance
Not ideal for
Drivers needing rim sizes above 20 inches Those who frequently drive through standing water Buyers prioritising long tread life
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Good for
Drivers regularly encountering heavy rain and standing water Owners of larger vehicles needing 18–22 inch fitments Higher-mileage motorway drivers prioritising fuel efficiency Those wanting Kumho's widest summer size selection
Not ideal for
Drivers prioritising short dry stopping distances Those sensitive to road and tyre noise Buyers looking for the sharpest price-to-performance ratio

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
15
18
3
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
9.0
6.1
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
226
47
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Verdict

Choose the Ecsta HS52 if you drive a smaller or mid-size car, want the strongest possible dry braking for confident everyday safety, and appreciate genuinely strong value for money. It is the more balanced package for mixed urban and country driving, and its EU wet grip A rating means it handles ordinary wet roads with confidence. Choose the Ecsta PS71 if you drive a larger vehicle, regularly encounter standing water or motorway spray, and need a bigger size selection — particularly if your car sits in the 18-to-22-inch range. Its aquaplaning resistance is its standout quality, and for drivers who spend significant time on fast, wet roads that advantage is real and meaningful. Just go in knowing it will be noisier. Both are credible choices within Kumho's lineup — the HS52 as the everyday value pick, the PS71 as the wet-road specialist for more demanding fitments.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store