18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
5
18
13
3
4
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
2.8
6.1
4.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
139
47
123
36
40

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison