18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
10
5
18
3
4
14
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
2.8
6.1
3.7
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
139
47
36
40
700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store