Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

5

14

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

2.8

3.6

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

109

139

194

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Confidence

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Confidence

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Costs

Confidence

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison