18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
10
1
3
14
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
1.0
3.7
5.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
27
36
700

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison