18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
10
4
4
24
3
2
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
12.0
2.7
3.7
1.5
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
40
111
302
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store