18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
10
4
4
24
14
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
12.0
2.7
3.6
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
40
111
302
194

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison