18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
4
4
14
4
3
4
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
12.0
3.6
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
40
111
194
40
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store