18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
5
13
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
2.8
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
40
139
123
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store