18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
4
5
18
3
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.3
2.8
6.1
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
40
139
47
36
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison