18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
4
14
6
1
4
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
3.6
4.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
40
194
146
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store