18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
5
1
6
4
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
2.2
1.0
4.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
109
63
66
146
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store