18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
10
16
4
6
3
4
5
Best position
#2
#3
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
5.5
12.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
153
111
146
36
40
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison