Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

10

16

23

4

3

14

Best position

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

5.5

3.3

3.7

3.6

Latest test

2026

2023

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

109

153

176

40

36

194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContact

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Efficient Grip Performance

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison