18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
18
13
4
6
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
6.1
4.3
3.3
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
47
123
40
146
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store