18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
18
4
28
5
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
6.1
12.0
2.3
2.8
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
109
47
111
68
139
Confidence
Medium confidence

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store