18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
18
1
6
3
4
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
47
27
146
36
40
Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store