18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
21
13
5
4
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
11.9
4.3
2.2
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
165
123
63
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Indicative only
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Comfort
Indicative only
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dry
Indicative only
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Costs
Indicative only
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store