Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

10

3

16

5

28

4

Best position

#2

#3

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

3.7

5.5

2.2

2.3

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2023

2025

2026

Available sizes

109

36

153

63

68

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Interior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Price/value

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison