Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Ecsta HS52

Zeon CS8

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

14

4

3

Best position

#2

#9

#2

Average position

6.0

19.7

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

109

147

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Cooper Zeon CS8

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Cooper Zeon CS8

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Cooper Zeon CS8

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Cooper Zeon CS8

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Cooper Zeon CS8

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Cooper Zeon CS8

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Cooper Zeon CS8

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Cooper Zeon CS8

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Cooper Zeon CS8

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Cooper Zeon CS8

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Cooper Zeon CS8

49%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Cooper Zeon CS8

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Cooper Zeon CS8 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Cooper Zeon CS8 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Cooper Zeon CS8 vs Firestone Roadhawk

Cooper Zeon CS8 vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Zeon CS8

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison