18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
10
17
4
14
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
1.7
3.3
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
80
40
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store