18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
1
13
3
4
Best position
#2
#7
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
7.0
4.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
88
123
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store