18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 74% compared to 53% of the Continental UltraContact. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Continental UltraContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the UltraContact were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental UltraContact also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Number of tests
10
1
Best position
#2
#7
Average position
6.0
7.0
Latest test
2026
2023
Available sizes
109
87

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store