18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
14
5
4
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.6
2.8
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
194
139
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store