18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
14
4
18
3
5
Best position
#2
#8
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
12.0
6.1
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
109
153
111
47
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store