18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS51Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS51

R14 – R18
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3) Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
14
5
Best position
#1
#8
#1
Average position
9.3
13.4
2.8
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
Available sizes
99
153
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry driving behavior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Fuel efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Continental PremiumContact 6Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Maxxis Premitra HP5Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store