Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS51

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8

R15 – R20

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Ecsta HS51

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Number of tests

10

14

18

Best position

#1

#8

#1

Average position

9.3

13.4

6.1

Latest test

2021

2026

2024

Available sizes

99

153

47

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance

88%

Kumho

Ecsta HS51

65%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Wet Braking

Kumho Ecsta HS51

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Wet Handling

Kumho Ecsta HS51

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

49%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

Wet Circle Cornering

Kumho Ecsta HS51

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

78%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Kumho Ecsta HS51

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

Aquaplaning Cross

Kumho Ecsta HS51

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

58%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Dry Performance

82%

Kumho

Ecsta HS51

86%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dry Braking

Kumho Ecsta HS51

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Dry Handling

Kumho Ecsta HS51

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Comfort & Noise

71%

Kumho

Ecsta HS51

75%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Noise Exterior

Kumho Ecsta HS51

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Noise Interior

Kumho Ecsta HS51

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Ride Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS51

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Economy

72%

Kumho

Ecsta HS51

77%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Rolling Resistance

Kumho Ecsta HS51

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Fuel Efficiency

Kumho Ecsta HS51

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta HS51

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2021	205/55 R16	View
ADAC	Summer	2021	205/55 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ecsta HS51

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison