18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
14
6
4
5
Best position
#1
#8
#3
#2
#1
Average position
9.3
13.4
4.7
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
99
153
146
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry driving behavior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Costs
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Fuel efficiency
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store