18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
4
1
14
Best position
#6
#1
#8
Average position
12.8
1.0
13.4
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
102
66
153

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
59%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Wet braking
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Comfort
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Dry
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Costs
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store