18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 79% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.

Test Profile

Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
6
Best position
#6
#3
Average position
12.8
4.7
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
102
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet handling
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Comfort
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Costs
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dry
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store