18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Kumho
EcowinG ES01 KH27
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
14
6
Best position
#6
#8
#3
Average position
12.8
13.4
4.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
102
153
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet handling
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Comfort
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Costs
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dry
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store