Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 77% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 36.2 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||