• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 77% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# Kleber KRISALP HP3
/77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
/87%

Add to comparison

Kleber
Kumho
DimensionsR14 - R20 R0 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+1–1
Kleber Krisalp HP3
Rating: Satisfactory
32+ 12+
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Rating: Good
2+ 2+ 1– 2
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetSnow
Best values in test32.627.1
Kleber Krisalp HP336.227.1
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+33.528.3
Show test details