18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Viking
WinTech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
11
6
4
3
2
14
Best position
#1
#11
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.6
20.8
3.3
3.7
2.0
3.6
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
122
59
40
36
48
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Viking WinTech
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Viking WinTech
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Viking WinTech
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Comfort
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Viking WinTech
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Viking WinTech
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Viking WinTech
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Costs
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store