18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Viking
WinTech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
11
6
4
3
28
Best position
#1
#11
#2
#2
#1
Average position
11.6
20.8
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
122
59
40
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Viking WinTech
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Viking WinTech
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Viking WinTech
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Viking WinTech
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store