18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Kleber Dynaxer HP4Upper-middle
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP4

6.7
R14 – R17
Viking WinTechBudget
VikingViking

WinTech

5.3
R13 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Viking
WinTech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
11
6
4
14
3
5
Best position
#1
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.6
20.8
3.3
3.6
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
122
59
40
194
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Viking WinTech
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Viking WinTech
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Viking WinTech
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Viking WinTech
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Comfort
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Viking WinTech
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Viking WinTech
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Viking WinTech
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Costs
Confidence
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Viking WinTech
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMKleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3Viking WinTech vs Radar Dimax AlpineViking WinTech vs Giti Gitiwinter W2Viking WinTech vs Apollo Alnac 4G WinterViking WinTech vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store