18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

When comparing the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Nokian WetProof, a noticeable difference in strengths and weaknesses emerges. Understanding the key features and performance of each tyre can guide you towards making the right purchase decision that suits your driving needs.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4, designed by Kleber, stands out for its environmental performance, efficiency, wear resistance and mileage. While it generally scores well, it has its drawbacks, particularly when it comes to driving on wet surfaces. This summer tyre demonstrates decent aquaplaning characteristics, shorter wet and dry braking distances, and excellent driving comfort due to low exterior noise. However, it shows a considerable weakness in grip on wet roads, a slightly delayed steering response, and understeering behaviour on dry tracks. Its overall rating stands at 74%, positioning 10th and 14th in ADAC and Autobild tests, respectively.


In contrast, the Nokian WetProof – a product of Nokian, known for their sturdy and reliable tyres – exhibits admirable overall performance. This summer-optimized tyre is specifically praised for its balanced characteristics on both wet and dry roads and its fuel efficiency. Its only notable drawbacks are the lower environmental score, and compromises on tyre life and wear resistance. Some minor issues with its sustainability were also noted. Still, its effectiveness and stable performance under various conditions earned it a decent score of 68% and secured a 6th place in tests by both ADAC and Autobild.


Comparatively, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 takes the lead in terms of environmental impact and life, while the Nokian WetProof shines with its balanced handling and efficiency. Both tyres hold their ground in respective areas, offering pros and cons to consider for the discerning buyer.


Overall, when we weigh the test results, and the inherent strengths and weaknesses of these tyres, the Nokian WetProof seems to have a slight edge over the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, particularly when it comes to driving on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it's worth noting the results, along with the personal needs and preferences, will differ for every individual driver.


Please note that to date, neither of these tyres has been replaced with newer models. Make sure to do thorough research and consider your specific driving conditions before committing to a new set of tyres.

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
11
14
3
15
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
5.6
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2024
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
121
47
40
225

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Nokian WetProof
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Nokian WetProof
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Nokian WetProof
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Nokian WetProof
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison