18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex

When comparing the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Nokian WetProof, a noticeable difference in strengths and weaknesses emerges. Understanding the key features and performance of each tyre can guide you towards making the right purchase decision that suits your driving needs.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4, designed by Kleber, stands out for its environmental performance, efficiency, wear resistance and mileage. While it generally scores well, it has its drawbacks, particularly when it comes to driving on wet surfaces. This summer tyre demonstrates decent aquaplaning characteristics, shorter wet and dry braking distances, and excellent driving comfort due to low exterior noise. However, it shows a considerable weakness in grip on wet roads, a slightly delayed steering response, and understeering behaviour on dry tracks. Its overall rating stands at 74%, positioning 10th and 14th in ADAC and Autobild tests, respectively.


In contrast, the Nokian WetProof – a product of Nokian, known for their sturdy and reliable tyres – exhibits admirable overall performance. This summer-optimized tyre is specifically praised for its balanced characteristics on both wet and dry roads and its fuel efficiency. Its only notable drawbacks are the lower environmental score, and compromises on tyre life and wear resistance. Some minor issues with its sustainability were also noted. Still, its effectiveness and stable performance under various conditions earned it a decent score of 68% and secured a 6th place in tests by both ADAC and Autobild.


Comparatively, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 takes the lead in terms of environmental impact and life, while the Nokian WetProof shines with its balanced handling and efficiency. Both tyres hold their ground in respective areas, offering pros and cons to consider for the discerning buyer.


Overall, when we weigh the test results, and the inherent strengths and weaknesses of these tyres, the Nokian WetProof seems to have a slight edge over the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, particularly when it comes to driving on both dry and wet surfaces. However, it's worth noting the results, along with the personal needs and preferences, will differ for every individual driver.


Please note that to date, neither of these tyres has been replaced with newer models. Make sure to do thorough research and consider your specific driving conditions before committing to a new set of tyres.

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
11
14
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
11.6
5.6
3.7
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
Available sizes
121
47
34

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison