18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
11
13
4
18
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.6
4.3
3.3
6.1
1.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
122
123
40
47
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%

Tread pattern comparison

Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store