Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraContact NXT

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

11

4

49

5

24

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.6

3.3

3.2

2.2

2.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

122

40

213

63

302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Wet performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dry performance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dry driving behavior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Interior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

97%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison