18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
11
4
49
28
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.6
3.3
3.2
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
122
40
213
67

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison